Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Year articles for "big" years: new section) |
(→Ep-refs?: new section) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This is only a suggestion, however, I don't know how many of you want to expand this out in minor articles, cause this one is getting big. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 20:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | This is only a suggestion, however, I don't know how many of you want to expand this out in minor articles, cause this one is getting big. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 20:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Ep-refs? == | |||
I think these items need ep-refs. Obviously the smallest kind we have, so as not to clutter the place up. But it really really needs it. --[[User:Buddy13|Buddy]] 21:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:37, 5 April 2009
Fry's nephew
- Note: Discussion moved to Talk:Philip J. Fry, II#Age
Year articles for "big" years
There are some years that could do with its own article, such as 3000, 3001, etc. But also 2000 and 1999 and thereabouts. Minor periods will of course remain in this article, but the "big years" will be split into their own article.
This is only a suggestion, however, I don't know how many of you want to expand this out in minor articles, cause this one is getting big. --SvipTalk 20:15, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Ep-refs?
I think these items need ep-refs. Obviously the smallest kind we have, so as not to clutter the place up. But it really really needs it. --Buddy 21:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)