Difference between revisions of "Talk:Futurama status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Svip moved page Talk:Futurama status to Talk:Second cancellation of Futurama: Discussing the Futurama status might - hopefully - be important in the future. But for now, it should discuss the re-cancellation or second cancellation of Futurama.) |
Harq al ada (talk | contribs) (→Move: I commented on a recent piece of news I feel is poorly supported.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Move == | == Move == | ||
It would make more sense for the page to be named ''Status'', like ''[[Canon]]'', which everyone knows refers to '''the canon of ''Futurama'''''. (This being a ''Futurama'' wiki and all...) By the way, is that article's capitalised ''Canon'' in midsentence intentional? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 23:56, 22 March 2011 (CET) | It would make more sense for the page to be named ''Status'', like ''[[Canon]]'', which everyone knows refers to '''the canon of ''Futurama'''''. (This being a ''Futurama'' wiki and all...) By the way, is that article's capitalised ''Canon'' in midsentence intentional? [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] 23:56, 22 March 2011 (CET) | ||
== Film == | |||
I followed the link evidencing the creation of a fifth Futurama movie, it does mention that there has been talk about the creation of a new movie, but it's vague. Groening and Cohen have been implying it vaguely for a while, I'm not sure this article is a good basis for putting it as recent news dated to the release of this article. If there is a different article evidencing it more clearly, maybe the link should just be changed. [[User:harq al ada|harq al ada]] 05:28, 02 October 2013 | |||
Revision as of 11:30, 2 October 2013
Move
It would make more sense for the page to be named Status, like Canon, which everyone knows refers to the canon of Futurama. (This being a Futurama wiki and all...) By the way, is that article's capitalised Canon in midsentence intentional? Sanfazer 23:56, 22 March 2011 (CET)
Film
I followed the link evidencing the creation of a fifth Futurama movie, it does mention that there has been talk about the creation of a new movie, but it's vague. Groening and Cohen have been implying it vaguely for a while, I'm not sure this article is a good basis for putting it as recent news dated to the release of this article. If there is a different article evidencing it more clearly, maybe the link should just be changed. harq al ada 05:28, 02 October 2013