Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stench and Stenchibility"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Okay, I think there valid goofs as they break continuity or realism. My first one about it breaking natural response I suppose that counts as under humor, but I still think it...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Okay, I think there valid goofs as they break continuity or realism. My first one about it breaking natural response I suppose that counts as under humor, but I still think it should be included. My second one, I think its a serious breech of Continuity to have a dead character alive, normally in this show if they come back, they give an explanation why. So him just appearing out of the blue is a breech. My final point is what happened, defied what he said, and that sort of error is included for other episodes. I have to leave now, so I won't reply to your response till later today. | Okay, I think there valid goofs as they break continuity or realism. My first one about it breaking natural response I suppose that counts as under humor, but I still think it should be included. My second one, I think its a serious breech of Continuity to have a dead character alive, normally in this show if they come back, they give an explanation why. So him just appearing out of the blue is a breech. My final point is what happened, defied what he said, and that sort of error is included for other episodes. I have to leave now, so I won't reply to your response till later today. {{unsigned|86.157.186.168}} | ||
: They are not mistakes "made by the episode". Plots holes, for example, are goofs, but bad storytelling isn't a goof. [[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) 17:02, 30 August 2013 (CEST). | |||
Revision as of 17:02, 30 August 2013
Okay, I think there valid goofs as they break continuity or realism. My first one about it breaking natural response I suppose that counts as under humor, but I still think it should be included. My second one, I think its a serious breech of Continuity to have a dead character alive, normally in this show if they come back, they give an explanation why. So him just appearing out of the blue is a breech. My final point is what happened, defied what he said, and that sort of error is included for other episodes. I have to leave now, so I won't reply to your response till later today. -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by 86.157.186.168.