Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Alien species"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Content from Category talk:Alien Species: new section) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Technically, robots don't count as species, but I don't think we should take them out. --[[User:Unit 3.0]] 19:25, 15 September, 2010 | Technically, robots don't count as species, but I don't think we should take them out. --[[User:Unit 3.0]] 19:25, 15 September, 2010 | ||
:I agree, I've had a restructure of these categories on my to do list for ages. - [[User:Quolnok|Quolnok]] 02:49, 16 September 2010 (CEST) | |||
== Content from [[Category talk:Alien Species]] == | == Content from [[Category talk:Alien Species]] == |
Revision as of 02:49, 16 September 2010
Technically, robots don't count as species, but I don't think we should take them out. --User:Unit 3.0 19:25, 15 September, 2010
- I agree, I've had a restructure of these categories on my to do list for ages. - Quolnok 02:49, 16 September 2010 (CEST)
Content from Category talk:Alien Species
Why are there so many categories about creatures? The categories Creatures, Alien Species, and Aliens, should all be put into one category. - User:Unit 3.0 16:54, 17 November 2009(PDT)
- No, they shouldn't. Category:Aliens are individuals who are neither human or robot - this could be further subdivided into common species, for example Decapodians. Alien Species and Creatures are slightly ambiguous, and should be reconfigured:
- Lifeforms (species, models and subspecies)
- Creatures (species and individuals)
- Sentient Life (species, models and subspecies)
- Robots (specie, models and individuals)
- Humans (specie, subspecies and individuals)
- Aliens (species, subspecies and individuals)
- Lifeforms (species, models and subspecies)
- The articles on humans and subspecies - mutants - goes into "Humans" and "Sentient Life"; same deal for models of robot. Individuals only appear in the third level. - Quolnok 23:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)